Title:
|
Dublin Core Collection Description
|
Creator:
|
Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group
|
Date Issued:
|
2004-02-01
|
Identifier:
|
|
Replaces:
|
Not applicable
|
Is Replaced By:
|
|
Latest Version:
|
|
Status of Document:
|
This is a DCMI Working Draft.
|
Description of Document: | This document presents a proposal from the Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group for a new element refinement, provenance. |
|
Name | provenance |
Label | Provenance |
Definition | A statement of any changes in ownership and custody of the resource since its creation that are significant for its authenticity, integrity and interpretation. |
Comment | The statement may include a description of any changes successive custodians made to the resource. |
Examples |
The provenance of an object: The volume was presented to John Smith by Jones and Company on the occasion of his retirement from the company in 1888, and was located in Smith's private library until 1895, when it was sold to Wilson Booksellers of Liverpool. It was purchased for the National Library at auction in Manchester in June 1899. The provenance of a collection: The Smith collection was held by the Smith family in the library at Smith Hall. Letters written by John Smith and sent to Tom Jones remained in the custody of Jones until his death in 1966 when they were returned to Smith. The Smith collection was presented to the University Library as a gift by James Smith on 5 May 1973. |
Type of term | Element refinement |
Term qualified | Description, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, v1.1 [dc:description]http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description |
Why needed | Information about changes in the ownership or custody of a collection may be important in helping a user to select a resource and/or, having selected a resource, to interpret the resource. |
Working Group support | (to be confirmed). |
Proposed status | Recommended |
Related DCMI terms | None. |
Related non-DCMI terms | The International Standard for Archival Description (ISAD(G)), Second Edition (2000) is a descriptive standard for archival records. It can be applied to units of description at any level from the collection (or fonds) to the individual item, and includes two related elements:
ISAD(G) does not itself provide a machine-readable binding. The proposed term would be used to capture information recorded in both of these ISAD(G) elements. The Encoded Archival Description (EAD) DTD is a standard for encoding archival finding aids using SGML or XML. It includes two XML elements:
These are XML elements, not RDF properties. The proposed term would be used to capture information recorded in both of these EAD elements. DSpace is a digital library system to capture, store, index, preserve, and redistribute the intellectual output of a university’s research faculty in digital formats. The Dublin Core-based DSpace metadata schema includes an element refinement:
The SIMILE project has developed RDF bindings for DSpace metadata, and an RDF property is described in |
Impact on applications | If existing DC applications for collection-level description capture this data, they probably do so as part of the value of a dc:description element. The introduction of a distinct term allows the metadata creator to separate this subset of information from the description of the scope and content of the collection. As the proposed term is defined as a refinement of dc:description , a statement using the proposed term can be "dumbed-down" to a statement using a dc:description element. |
About the proposers |
The term is proposed by the Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group. One of the primary aims of the WG is the development of a Dublin Core Application Profile (DCAP) for collection-level description, i.e. for the description of a collection as a resource, rather than the description of the individual items that make up that collection. Records of the activity of the WG are available in the mailing list archives. The current draft of the Collection Description Application Profile is available at |