Title:
|
Dublin Core Collection Description
|
Creator:
|
Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group
|
Date Issued:
|
2004-03-14
|
Identifier:
|
|
Replaces:
|
|
Is Replaced By:
|
Not applicable
|
Latest Version:
|
|
Status of Document:
|
This is a DCMI Working Draft.
|
Description of Document: | This document presents a proposal from the Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group for a new element refinement, provenance. |
|
Name | provenance |
Label | Provenance |
Definition | A statement of any changes in the ownership and custody of the resource that are significant for its authenticity, integrity or interpretation. |
Comment | |
Examples |
The provenance of a digital object: This image was purchased from the University of Sometown, Department of Special Collections and Archives in November 2001. The provenance of a physical object: The volume was presented to John Smith by Jones and Company on the occasion of his retirement from the company in 1888, and was located in Smith's private library until 1895, when it was sold to Wilson Booksellers of Liverpool. It was purchased for the National Library at auction in Manchester in June 1899. The provenance of a collection: The Smith collection was held by the Smith family in the library at Smith Hall. Letters written by John Smith and sent to Tom Jones remained in the custody of Jones until his death in 1966 when they were returned to Smith. The Smith collection was presented to the University Library as a gift by James Smith on 5 May 1973. |
Type of term | Element |
Term qualified | [n/a] |
Why needed | Information about changes in the ownership or custody of a collection may be important in helping a user to select a resource and/or, having selected a resource, to interpret the resource. |
Working Group support | See the mailing list archives of the WG, especially Jan 2004 and Feb 2004. |
Proposed status | Conforming |
Related DCMI terms | None. |
Related non-DCMI terms | The International Standard for Archival Description (ISAD(G)), Second Edition (2000) is a descriptive standard for archival records. It can be applied to units of description at any level from the collection (or fonds) to the individual item, and includes two related elements:
ISAD(G) does not itself provide a machine-readable binding. The proposed term would be used to capture information recorded in both of these ISAD(G) elements. The Encoded Archival Description (EAD) DTD is a standard for encoding archival finding aids using SGML or XML. It includes two XML elements:
These are XML elements, not RDF properties. The proposed term would be used to capture information recorded in both of these EAD elements. DSpace is a digital library system to capture, store, index, preserve, and redistribute the intellectual output of a university's research faculty in digital formats. The Dublin Core-based DSpace metadata schema includes an element refinement:
The proposed term would not be suitable for the capture of this information in all cases as the proposed term covers the description of ownership/custody changes but not changes made to the resource. |
Impact on applications | There is currently no means of recording this information in DC metadata: it can not be recorded as a value of dc:description as it is not "An account of the content of the resource". The introduction of this element allows the metadata creator to capture this information. |
About the proposers |
The term is proposed by the Dublin Core Collection Description Working Group. One of the primary aims of the WG is the development of a Dublin Core Application Profile (DCAP) for collection-level description, i.e. for the description of a collection as a resource, rather than the description of the individual items that make up that collection. Records of the activity of the WG are available in the mailing list archives. The current draft of the Collection Description Application Profile is available at |