LEGAL
DISCLAIMER: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information in this
communication is accurate we cannot accept responsibility for any action, legal
or otherwise, based on this material.
Brian Kelly |
Would you like to introduce yourselves. I'm Brian Kelly, UK Web Focus - an advisory post to the UK HE & FE community on Web developments. |
Jenny Niven |
Jenny Niven, member of the VLS team |
Adrian Tribe |
I'm the Web Editor
at Birkbeck, |
Nicol Ferguson |
Nicol Ferguson, Assistant Project Officer in VLS Team at RGU |
Damon Querry |
Damon Querry, Web
Development Officer, |
Helen Ashton |
Helen Ashton,
courseware developer and Teaching Fellow at |
Brian Kelly |
What salary for your Web Editor post? And how long do you expect them to stay if it's a low salary scale? |
Ian Sealy |
Ian Sealy, Web
Developer at the Institute for Learning and Research Technology at the |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
Heather McKiggan-Fee, Research Fellow on the SHEFC-funded MAPPING project. I designed the project website. |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
Oh yes, |
Shaun Allan |
Shaun Allan, web
developer |
Marie-Laur Bouchet |
say Marie-Laure, Nottingham Trent Uni library - in charge of Web pages and electronic resources |
Chris Whincop |
me - courseware developer, ex university and FE lecturer, now freelance |
Brian Kelly |
Aren't all Web sites
in the middle of a revamp?? |
Ralph Weedon |
Ralph Weedon,
Internet Copyright Officer, |
Shaun Allan |
indeed Brian ;) |
Adrian Tribe |
Are you asking me Brian? The Web Developer post will be an AR Grade 2. Not enough I know, but... |
Ralph Weedon |
I also work for the JISC Legal Information Service |
Jim Everett |
Jim Everett, Open
Learning Manager, |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Rachel |
Rachel Harris |
Hi, all. |
Jim Everett |
just as a matter of interest, is this chat going to be archived? |
Jenny Niven |
It will be, yes |
Helen Ashton |
Archiving will be useful - this all moves very fast!!! |
Jenny Niven |
Is everyone ok with the archive being placed in the discussion room? |
Rachel Harris |
Yes, Jenny |
Helen Ashton |
Yes Jenny, fine with me |
Adrian Tribe |
Yes, Jenny, no problem. |
Brian Kelly |
Ralph, are there any legal implications about the archive? Is Jenny's request sufficient? |
Chris Whincop |
Jenny: no problem with archiving |
Ralph Weedon |
Yes, fine with me |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
Yes, archiving is fine by me. |
Ralph Weedon |
I am not a lawyer and cannot give professional advice but ... |
Brian Kelly |
Jenny, archiving is also fine by me. |
Ralph Weedon |
As long as people are aware that the discussion will be archived |
Ralph Weedon |
Then probably it's fine. |
Ralph Weedon |
People have the option to leave ... hope they wont |
Brian Kelly |
Thanks Ralph. There are now 15 participants. I'll remind people from time to time about the transcript archives. |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
If you want more
space for typing comments, increase your screen resolution - that way you can
type twice as much before the box runs out. |
Jim Everett |
unfortunately I need to go to a meeting just now so archiving would be wonderful |
Jenny Niven |
Ok Jim, hope to see you in the discussion room |
Brian Kelly |
Thanks for the tip heather. Note that I'm using the ActiveX client. I type my messages in a Notepad window, and can then copy and paste them. I don't think you can do this with the Java client. |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
Another bonus is that the chat window is also larger, so you can see more of the discussion at once. But have a larger data entry box is a real advantage! |
Jenny Niven |
Hi David |
David Robinson |
hi all |
Rachel Harris |
Brian, I'd be interested to hear more of your thoughts on open source vs licensed solutions... |
Brian Kelly |
Hi Rachel. Will discuss this in a bit. First the preliminaries. |
Brian Kelly |
----------------------- START OF MEETING ------------------------------- |
Brian Kelly |
It's now 1pm on Thursday 2 August 2001. Welcome to the VLS chat on Web Developments. |
Brian Kelly |
Today's discussion should last for an hour. It will only be a success if people participate actively - so please air your views and don't just lurk. |
Brian Kelly |
As this is a real time chat there is unlikely to be time to give considered response. So feel free to be controversial, disagree with others - although please don't flame. |
Brian Kelly |
We've had the introductions. For the record I'm Brian Kelly, UK Web Focus - an advisory post to the UK HE & FE community on Web developments. |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Emma |
Brian Kelly |
NOTE to Emma - Hi, we've just started. Can you introduce yourself. |
Emma Templeton |
Hi Jenny, Hello to everyone else |
Brian Kelly |
Note that a transcript of the discussion will be archived and made publically available. |
Brian Kelly |
BTW my suggested topics for today's chat is at http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/online/VLS-aug-2001/ |
Emma Templeton |
I work for the Robert Gordon University Virtual Campus developing online courses |
Brian Kelly |
Thanks. |
Brian Kelly |
hi Iain. Can you introduce yourself |
Brian Kelly |
Proposition 1 - Web developers should be making use of W3C and related standards and should avoid proprietary solutions. Would you agree or disagree? |
Brian Kelly |
Before accusing me of making a 'motherhood and apple pie' statement that no-one could possible disagree with, remember that your user community is probably more interested in functionality rather than standards - and interesting functionality is often based on vendor-specific proprietary features :-) Also compliance with standards can be difficult - current tools may not support them, there will be training implications, etc. |
Brian Kelly |
What are your views? |
Helen Ashton |
Doesn't this depend on your intended audience? |
Chris Whincop |
I agree with the proposition |
Jenny Niven |
Agreed Helen - you'll never be able to please everyone also |
Iain Middleton |
hELLO (he says in traditional caps locked style!) - I'm Iain Middleton, Web Editor for The Robert Gordon University |
David Robinson |
I think standards are important however annoying as they make us developers think of all viewers and not just a majority |
Ralph Weedon |
In some cases, for
example VLE's solutions are often a bit of both, proprietary and customised |
Adrian Tribe |
I think we should strive to use standards-based solutions where possible, but recognising that sometimes we'll |
Marie-Laur Bouchet |
doesn't it depend if you are developing a VLE for internal use - wouldn't proprietary stds be ok then? |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Bryan |
Adrian Tribe |
have to use proprietary solutions to achieve what we want. |
Helen Ashton |
I don't think there is one answer to this. Some times what you are trying to do requires that you break away from standards... |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Mike, Phillip and Rebecca. We've not long started would you like to introduce yourselves? |
Ralph Weedon |
Whether or not a VLE is for internal use, if the standards make sense, why not use them? |
Helen Ashton |
Other times the breadth of the audience is more important and so standards rise above vendor-specific issues... |
Brian Kelly |
Also note that there will be a public transcript of this discussion. |
David Robinson |
standards can involve increase in development time as they often involve the moving and reposition of pages |
Chris Whincop |
for internal use, yes, proprietary is fine, to an extent, but if you want to recycle, move to other platforms, not get tied in... |
Mike McConnell |
Hi, I'm Mike from the University of Aberdeen, where I'm Web Manager |
Shaun Allan |
standards are fine but sometimes the speed of technology "take up" can leave committees (W3C,etc) in their wake |
Brian Kelly |
Helen and Marie-L seem to be saying that proprietary solutions are ok for local use. I would disagree. What may be internal today, may be used by others tomorrow. Companies merge. So do Universities |
Adrian Tribe |
Or vice-versa Shaun - which browsers support some of the accessibility-related features of CSS2? |
Shaun Allan |
good point |
Philip Adams |
Sorry I am late, I could not find the door. I am looking after the web pages for De Montfort University library. Making them more useful is a key preoccupation right now. |
Helen Ashton |
Brian: Not necessarily, but it is a matter of weighing up the priorities... |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Ffinlo |
Marie-Laur Bouchet |
you're right in a long-term view Brian, but isn't the problem with non-adherence to standards that people don't have time and want a quick solution? |
Brian Kelly |
I would agree with Adrian. There are many examples of standards which are ahead of the game e.g. SMIL, SVG are standards, but widespread support isn't there yet. |
Shaun Allan |
Brian! issue detention ; ) |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Catherine |
Brian Kelly |
yes Maire-L, the time and resources issue is a factor - but don't forget the resources needed to move from a proprietary to open solution in the future. |
Adrian Tribe |
We're trying to educate our Web Maintainers about the relevant standards, but being realistic in our expectations of what they will actually do! |
Brian Kelly |
Also I suspect that many people here will be aware of these issues, but many other Web developers won't be and will find themselves getting sucked into proprietary solutions. |
Helen Ashton |
Ah yes, definitely agree there Brian! |
Iain Middleton |
I think that institutions need to have confidence that standards actually suit their needs - and their way of doing things. Sometimes it's easier to take a blank slate and start there, rather than trying to adapt something else which may not map onto existing ways of doing things very obviously |
Chris Whincop |
has anyone here developed for AICC or SCORM compliance yet? Or are these 'standards' still proprietary? |
Brian Kelly |
SO were is the hardcore stick with Microsoft /Macromedia cos they are cool advocates! |
Brian Kelly |
What is AICC and SCORM |
Helen Ashton |
Don't get me started on Microsoft!!! |
Brian Kelly |
BTW SVG is Scalable Vector Graphics and SMIL is Synchronised Multimedia Interchange Language - important new standards for elearning applications. |
Adrian Tribe |
A public-sector body is in a better position to "enforce" standards adherence I think, due to e-government guidelines, disability laws, etc |
Brian Kelly |
Ahh the e-Government guidelines. I've something to say about them. |
Ralph Weedon |
Yes. The new Special Educational Needs and Disability Act should be noted! |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Mandy |
Chris Whincop |
this glossary has AICC and SCORM links: http://www.brandon-hall.net/glossary/ |
Mandy Bentham |
Hi All |
Adrian Tribe |
Go on then Brian...! |
Brian Kelly |
Version 3 of the UK Government's e-Government Interoperability Framework (e-GIF) is now out for comment. (e-GIF) is now out for comment. |
Damon Querry |
Often us web types are forced into working with proprietary solutions because when someone actually starts talking to us it's a done deal. The institution's bought it and we've got to get along with it. Education needs to take place higher up, in mgt. |
Adrian Tribe |
Thanks for that - I've not seen that. |
Brian Kelly |
Compliance with v2 is (I think) mandatory for public sector bodies - which may include Universities. |
Ralph Weedon |
Brian, where is the e-GIF to be found? |
Damon Querry |
Their eyes need opening to this debate too. |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Michelle |
Brian Kelly |
E-GIF stuff at www.govtalk.gov.uk/, and select 'What's New' to see it. |
Ralph Weedon |
Thanks Brian |
Adrian Tribe |
No Brian, I don't think we're obliged to comply with the e-gov stuff yet - it's still very much focused on central and local government, isn’t it? |
Michelle Dosantos |
Hi Jenny - is everyone here for the discussion on Web Development? |
Jenny Niven |
We are yes. It's been going for about 15 mins |
Brian Kelly |
Unfortunately many local and central authority Web sites fail to conform with the guidelines. I've recently surveyed the 18 shortlisted candidates for a national award - and all had HTML errors, most failed the Bobby accessibility test, etc. etc. |
Michelle Dosantos |
Ah right thanks. It's my first time here. |
Mandy Bentham |
Is the bobby test seen as the standard then? |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Andy, currently discussing standards in web development |
Brian Kelly |
Hi Adrian. Whether HE has to comply with E-GIUF regs is uncertain. A colleague of mine has been attending E-GIF meetings. I'll try and follow this up later. |
Andy Price |
Thanks Jenny, Hi Brian. |
Adrian Tribe |
OK Brian - that would be useful to know. |
Mike McConnell |
It's hard to enforce rigorous accessibility guidelines on one hand, and encourage participation by diverse authors on the other |
Brian Kelly |
bobby isn't a standard - but is a useful tool which gives an indication of compliance with W3C WAI standards. |
Mandy Bentham |
thanks |
Brian Kelly |
hi Mike - I agree that things get difficult if you wish to devolve responsibility to content to a wide audience. Let's follow that thread. |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Keith |
Keith Brooke |
Hi |
Ralph Weedon |
Is training and staff development relevant here? |
Brian Kelly |
Topic 2 - What type of tools are required to develop rich Web services? |
Mike McConnell |
Well, often you can get people on board, and that's a good thing, but their knowledge of HTML is very basic |
Brian Kelly |
and training and staff dev. issues |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
If I appeared to leave, it's because my &*%Ł&%* computer crashed. Since this discussion is far too technical for me, I'm |
Heather McKiggan-Fee |
going to sign off and just read the transcript. Cheerio everyone! |
Iain Middleton |
If/when e-GIF regulations become compulsory, how do you think they will be implemented? Who will be the "responsible person" at institutions - will it just be a diktat dropped from on high onto people without any real ability to ensure cross-campus compliance? |
Jenny Niven |
Bye for now Heather |
Mike McConnell |
however, as they work within departments, etc., having them on board is invaluable for spreading the word |
Philip Adams |
We may need to look at editing software and how it is used. it is easier me to encourage people to add things through a web-based form into ROADS than to teach them how to edit pages using vi. So I get more compliant pages and they get simpler tasks. Both win. |
Brian Kelly |
many Web authors will be happy to comply with standards, but be let down by the tools which suck them into use of proprietary extensions, flawed architectures, etc. |
Mike McConnell |
It is often useful to go along with someone who is making initial errors and change their behaviour incrementally |
Jenny Niven |
Brian - interesting question. Hoping you'd be able to advise on that |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Kylie |
Rachel Harris |
How do you do that - change behaviour that is? |
Chris Whincop |
"the tools which suck them into use of proprietary extensions, flawed architectures" - I think Brian means FP. If so, I'd agree, but licensing agreements often dictate use of certain products within large institutions, and web teams are not the decision ma |
Helen Ashton |
Help them see WHY they should change? |
Brian Kelly |
Philip Adams has said it for me. Rather than looking at front Page vs Dreamweaver issues, we need to be providing tools which focus on letting authors provide content, with the way in which this is provided (HTML, XML, CSS, etc.) being left to an application. |
Mike McConnell |
well, if you offer support at first and not criticism, people tend to trust what you're saying |
Rachel Harris |
But it's not really feasible to do that on a large scale, sounds like the right tools is the best option. |
Brian Kelly |
Has anyone looked at use of Blogger-type tools? |
Helen Ashton |
Why do you think that is not feasible Rachel? |
Michelle Dosantos |
Does anyone know if there is an open source tool similar to Dreamweaver? |
Rachel Harris |
One to one guidance is very time consuming. |
Helen Ashton |
It doesn't have to be one to one though... |
Adrian Tribe |
Brian, that's why we want to introduce a Web Content Management System that will allow our information providers to do just that, without having to know about the technical details of authoring. |
Mike McConnell |
Tools is an ideal solution if you're starting from a fairly rational perspective. If, however, you have a large, mature site run by a large number of authors, incremental change is probably the best you can hope for |
Brian Kelly |
I agree with Mike that changing the culture from devolved control over HTML pages to CMS may be difficult. |
Emma Templeton |
Adrian this is what we are implementing for RGU's online learning environment |
Maurice Crockard |
How does CMS work with search engines externally? |
Brian Kelly |
So I think you need to start with a small-scale project - and demonstrate the benefits. |
Mike McConnell |
Emma, do you anticipate any resentment from established University authors? |
Rachel Harris |
Do you have any examples of this, Brian? |
Brian Kelly |
hi Maurice - with proper use of a CMS, the external view of resources can be OK. but you'll need to avoid use of query strings - which may be the default in some CMSs. |
Adrian Tribe |
We will be insisting on a CMS that allows us to have a phased introduction. |
Maurice Crockard |
Rachel : we're trying it out on a small Sports department development using PHP and my SQL |
Emma Templeton |
well not many will be established authors on the university web site they are lecturers putting up course content so perhaps? |
Adrian Tribe |
On the potential "resentment" issue, we are going down this route to widen considerably our base of content providers, many of whom are non-technical. We won't necessarily get existing Web maintainers to adopt it. |
Marie-Laur Bouchet |
if authors/lecturers are given lots of information as to why and how things are being done in a certain way |
Brian Kelly |
An example of a possible pilot use of a CMS would be use of a Blogger type tool such as Manilla (99 pounds for site licence for HE). |
Marie-Laur Bouchet |
then people will be less hesitant/critical of what we are asking them to do |
Rachel Harris |
Perhaps everyone could post further details of using CMS in the discussion room... |
Brian Kelly |
manilla is used to create Web logs. It can be used as a remotely-hosted authoring tool, with a simple interface. Behind the scenes it can do interesting stuff with standards (XML, XML-RPC, RSS, etc.) |
Rachel Harris |
so that they could be used to convince others of the benefits? |
Jenny Niven |
Great idea, Rachel |
Brian Kelly |
We hope to look at this tool ourselves in the near future (there is a month's evaluation copy available). Anyone fancy joining me in an evaluation? |
Rachel Harris |
Sounds interesting |
Emma Templeton |
i could be interested brian will contact you after the discussion. |
Chris Whincop |
Does indeed |
Brian Kelly |
Thanks Emma. BTW I guess we can all make contact afterwards by checking the membership details for this group - which should have email addresses, if you've provided them. |
Rachel Harris |
I had thought blogger's were just online diaries, but obviously not. |
Brian Kelly |
Shall we move on to a discussion on open source solutions? |
Brian Kelly |
----------------------- OPEN SOURCE -------------------------------- |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Lynn, we're about to discuss open source solutions |
Brian Kelly |
Hi Lynn. Can you introduce yourself. |
Brian Kelly |
Note that a transcript of the discussion will be archived and made publically available. |
Brian Kelly |
Proposition 2 - Belief in open standards does not necessarily mean that you have to go down an open source route. |
Brian Kelly |
Open source software can be expensive in terms of technical support. And Universities may fund it difficult to retain and recruit good technical staff. |
Brian Kelly |
The situation is likely to be worse in other sectors such as FE colleges - and least we tend to have good Postgrads around that we can employ from time to time. |
Brian Kelly |
What do you think? |
Rachel Harris |
Staff retention seems like a major issue to me |
Brian Kelly |
For the record there are now 24 participants |
Adrian Tribe |
Yes, that's true Brian. Balancing the immediate and long-term costs of any decisions like this can be difficult. |
Michelle Dosantos |
surely the benefits of open source would outweigh the cost issues. |
Adrian Tribe |
We will probably go down the open source route for our CMS, but in-house support will be crucial to this. |
Brian Kelly |
Staff recruitment and retention is a major problem for project initiatives (e.g. JISC, other UK, EU,m etc.) as staff would be appointed on short term contract. |
Iain Middleton |
Long term benefits vs budgetholders short term thinking! |
Adrian Tribe |
Our new Web Developer post will be tied partly to this, but we will have to make sure all our Web staff know what to do. |
Michelle Dosantos |
everyone seems to be caught up in an 'instant gratification' syndrome. If something doesn't pay off immediately we drop it |
Adrian Tribe |
I say "all" - by which I mean the other 2 of us! |
Brian Kelly |
But Michelle open sourceness is not a guarantee of success. there are many examples of open source bits of code which have failed to gain momentum. |
Chris Whincop |
oh dear. I love things that are free, and would love FE and HE to embrace Open Source - Linux, Apache, PHP, MySQL, but it doesn't seem likely for the reasons you mention, plus politics and the ‘nobody got fired for buying IBM (etc.)’ philosophy. |
Shaun Allan |
thats VERY true Michelle |
Brian Kelly |
Which word processor do you use Chris? |
Michelle Dosantos |
granted brian but its giving everyone a lot of freedom to be creative. IT has long suffered under the image that it is not... |
Michelle Dosantos |
creative and that people just churn out the same systems and code. I think that is now changing and even designers want... |
Michelle Dosantos |
to get in on the act. |
Chris Whincop |
Brian: right now, TexEdit - it's free. ;) |
Brian Kelly |
Who pays for designers to get in the act of open source solutions? |
David Robinson |
Brian I use word but his is forced on me due to communicating with academic staff |
Michelle Dosantos |
ah but who benefits? I encourage all of my designer and developers alike to work on projects outside of their normal roles |
David Robinson |
University Standards |
Brian Kelly |
Sorry that you are forced to communicate with your colleagues :-) |
David Robinson |
The point i am making that is not always open to choice |
David Robinson |
Like a lot of the software we use |
Chris Whincop |
Brian: I suspect we agree - development money comes from companies who plan to make a profit. |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Jose |
Jose Casal-Gimenez |
Hi! Hope that did not arrive too late! |
Brian Kelly |
In examples like Apache a quality open source product has been developed and it has sufficient high profile for there to be business models, benefits for its developers, etc. However this won't necessarily be the case for every application. |
Iain Middleton |
Critical mass... |
Brian Kelly |
As Web systems (IT systems) become more sophisticated / complex, there will be a need to make a significant investment to develop the code, documentation training, etc. |
Michelle Dosantos |
Right, so there do need to be some standards. an agreement for coherence. |
Brian Kelly |
The key is interoperability and standards so end users and organisations can make there chose of open source vs licensed solutions. |
Jenny Niven |
Hi Sean |
Brian Kelly |
I should also add that within a University context, there is also the issue of the future funding for developers on short-term contracts. |
Sean Brady |
Hi jenny, greetings from Liverpool |
David Robinson |
I think the day you are looking Brian is still very far away !! |
Iain Middleton |
And as systems become more complex, somehow they have to be made simpler if we're going to broaden participation... it depends whether we're talking about powerful tools for experts or simple ones which let "real people" do what they need to. |
Chris Whincop |
Larry Wall has a thing or two to say on the issue of Open-Source: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/larry.html |
Brian Kelly |
Hi Ian, no complex tools which hide their complexity from end users - like the CMS we poke about before. |
Chris Whincop |
..basically, Open-Source is a Good Thing, but then again he would, wouldn't he? ;) |
Jose Casal-Gimenez |
I don't think that it is too far away, David. We are already moving towards those systems and the main problem is the resources. Not many developers around the Universities |
Adrian Tribe |
Precisely Jose! |
David Robinson |
I don't think it is just a resource problem Jose |
Michelle Dosantos |
Right Jose but give any good developer a couple of weeks with a new language or program and he'll be tapping away like he's and expert |
Brian Kelly |
David, etc, can you give examples of open source projects you're involved in. |
Adrian Tribe |
On CMSs, it has often been pointed out that a half million pound investment in a packaged commercial product will still leave you with hefty support and development costs on top of that! |
Michelle Dosantos |
I'm currently working on a combination of Perl and Sql called DSQL... |
Jose Casal-Gimenez |
We are been asked to developed complex systems to facilitate the work of other that do not have enough experience/training. To develop those systems we need very strong commitment from the whole institution (change of culture?) |
Chris Whincop |
Adrian: very true |
Brian Kelly |
I should mention http://www.opensource.ac.uk/. Perhaps it would be useful to register open source projects there. |
David Robinson |
We are developing an integrated environment in the University which involves the use of PHP and it has come into play here |
Chris Whincop |
Thanks for the link, Brian |
Sean Brady |
I suspect the size of Institution is crucial at Liverpool Hope 5000 + students our 'home brewed' Module communication centre' attracted a good deal of use |
Brian Kelly |
Having just looked at it, there's not a lot there. Ian S. - do you know about this? |
Jenny Niven |
We'll post a listing of all the resources from this chat into the discussion room |
Brian Kelly |
I should say something about IMS and e-learning stuff in the context of open source. |
Maurice Crockard |
<aside> Are you all fast typists? Or anyone using voice-input? Perhaps these chat rooms are for younger folk! </aside> |
David Robinson |
Maurice i am typing but then i was brought up in chat rooms (lol) |
Michelle Dossantos |
Damn, 2pm gotta run. Thanks for the interesting discussion everyone hope to speak with you again soon. |
Jenny Niven |
Bye for now Michelle |
Brian Kelly |
I've had that JISC's view on VLEs is that IMS compliance will be mandatory. I also got the impression that providing this will be difficult, and it may only happen if there is a large company behind it. I did put the view of open source advocates when I heard this. |
Sean Brady |
<A HREF=http://hopelive.hope.ac.uk/hopelive/hopelive.htm>The entry to out MCCs</A> |
Brian Kelly |
before U all go, see you next Wednesday. |
Jenny Niven |
As Michelle pointed out it is coming up for 2. Are there any more burning issues to discuss? |
Ralph Weedon |
Brian, Richard is preparing a Briefing note on this |
Chris Whincop |
Here's an IMS/SCORM link: http://www.newstrolls.com/news/dev/downes/column000523_2.htm#sec4 |
Jenny Niven |
Many thanks to Brian for leading this discussion |
Ralph Weedon |
Agree, difficult to make IMS mandatory ... they are not complete, in draft etc |
Chris Whincop |
yes, thanks brian :) |
Adrian Tribe |
Good one Brian! |
David Robinson |
Cheers Brian |
Sean Brady |
Thank you Brian, remember there's a welcome at Hope for you |
Brian Kelly |
A final URL - see http://www.cetis.ac.uk/ for info on IMS. |
Jenny Niven |
We look forward to seeing you all in the discussion room |
David Robinson |
Is anyone going to ALT-C next month |
Brian Kelly |
Thanks everyone. See you soon. |
Marie-Laur Bouchet |
thanks Brian |
Iain Middleton |
Cheers Brian, and I hope to contribute more next week when I've learned how to type! |
Helen Ashton |
David, Hoping to go to ALT-C, yes... |
Jose Casal-Gimenez |
Thanks Brian |
Ralph Weedon |
Thanks Brian, hope to log on next week Bye! |
David Robinson |
If anyone is going it would be nice to meet up there |
Adrian Tribe |
See y'all. Bye! |
Jenny Niven |
bye all |
Jenny Niven |
bye |
LEGAL
DISCLAIMER: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information in this
communication is accurate we cannot accept responsibility for any action, legal
or otherwise, based on this material.