LEGAL
DISCLAIMER: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information in this
communication is accurate we cannot accept responsibility for any action, legal
or otherwise, based on this material.
Brian Kelly |
----------------------------------- START OF SESSION -------------------------- |
Brian Kelly |
Welcome to the online discussion on Approaches To Web Development. My name's Brian Kelly and I'm the facilitator. My job title is UK Web Focus - a JISC-funded advisory post to the UK HE and FE communities. Can you please introduce yourselves. |
Brian Kelly |
For the record, 10 participants at the start |
Jenny Niven |
My name is Jenny Niven, a member of the VLS team and interested in web development |
Emma Templeton |
My name is Emma
Templeton and I work with the |
Brian Kelly |
For the record, the following are logged in: brian.kelly, elaine.bloss, emma.templeton, evelyn.toseland, iain.middleton, jenny.niven, john.holman, mandy.bentham, ralph.weedon and roy.pearce |
Iain Middleton |
Hello - Iain Middleton, Web Editor at RGU, currently working on a major redevelopment of all our web services. |
Elaine Bloss |
I'm Elaine Bloss.
I'm the software engineer for the Centre for the Development of New Technologies
in Learning here at |
Ralph Weedon |
Ralph Weedon,
Internet Copyright Officer, |
Roy Pearce |
in computing systems, univ of bham, doing mainly unix sys admin |
Ralph Weedon |
Also Director of the JISC Legal Information Service, well co-coordinator anyway |
Brian Kelly |
A reminder - a transcript of this session will be made publicly available. |
Brian Kelly |
The session will only be of use if people contribute - so please don't lurk! |
Evelyn Toseland |
Evelyn Toseland,
webmaster for Faculty of Science, UWE Bristol. I work on online courses and
Faculty web pages and make the Intranet |
Brian Kelly |
------------------ END OF INTRODUCTIONS ----------------------------- |
Brian Kelly |
------------------ Constraints In The Real World ---------------------------- |
Brian Kelly |
In last week's session we discussed Web standards, content, management systems and open sources vs licensed solutions. Now that we've resolved those issues :-) this week I'd like to address the barriers to deploying our preferred solutions. |
Brian Kelly |
What barriers have you encountered? Feel free to include both technical and non-technical issues. |
Jenny Niven |
Institutional firewalls are often a problem |
Evelyn Toseland |
politics.... |
Mandy Bentham |
specify.. |
Jenny Niven |
We had problems with our old chat software on the VLS, many members couldn't access it through their firewalls |
Ralph Weedon |
Browser type and version has been a problem for multimedia software installation |
Elaine Bloss |
Yes, these have caused some problems for students using the Blackboard system here. |
Roy Pearce |
a significant non-tech barrier is the so-called theological differences, ie unix v windows |
Evelyn Toseland |
yes, my Mozilla fell over this morning using this VLS. |
Brian Kelly |
NOTE - when asking an individual a question, please give their name to avoid confusion |
Emma Templeton |
barriers - limited IT support and no expert help available |
Mandy Bentham |
re barriers - language! no idea what a Mozilla is, but will look it up. |
Iain Middleton |
Non-technical barriers... where budget/expenditure decisions are taken elsewhere in the organisation |
Ralph Weedon |
Limited IT support.resources was a problem here, they would only install in one or two labs |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes, Emma! Sorry Mandy, it's a browser. |
Brian Kelly |
Ok. Issues raised: (1) firewalls (and other Sys Adminy stuff); (2) Browser issues (3) Lack of IT support (4) Finance (5) Techie Cultural Issues (Unix vs Windows) |
Brian Kelly |
Any others? |
Evelyn Toseland |
How about lack of user knowledge? |
Brian Kelly |
If not, we'll try and discuss them in order. |
Brian Kelly |
Issues raised: (1) firewalls (and other Sys Adminy stuff) (2) Browser issues (3) Lack of IT support (4) Finance (5) Techie Cultural Issues (Unix vs Windows) (6) Users / Lack of user knowledge |
Ralph Weedon |
There may be general policy/legal issues |
Evelyn Toseland |
Copyright |
John Holman |
sorry .. I missed this .. these issues are difficulties in achieving .. what? |
Roy Pearce |
fear of hackers/intruders is a growing concern. |
Iain Middleton |
User inertia - resistance to change (even when it's good for them) |
Brian Kelly |
Barriers to deploying our Web services |
Evelyn Toseland |
not to forget viruses |
Elaine Bloss |
hackers is certainly a big one- |
Jenny Niven |
John - we're discussing technical constraints |
Brian Kelly |
So far we've got - Issues raised: (1) firewalls (and other SysAdmin and security stuff) (2) Browser issues (3) Lack of IT support (4) Finance (5) Techie Cultural Issues (Unix vs Windows) (6) Users / Lack of user knowledge (7) Legal / policy / copyright issues |
John Holman |
thanks .. ok then security generally, and the trade-off with functionality |
Roy Pearce |
I wonder f there is a 'drawbridge' mentality, i.e. repel the unknown and stick to the familiar (mixing my metaphors here) |
Brian Kelly |
Shall we do Issues raised: (1) firewalls (and other SysAdmin and security stuff) (2) Techie Cultural Issues (Unix vs Windows) (3) Browser issues (4) Lack of IT support (5) Finance (6) Users / Lack of user knowledge (7) Legal / policy / copyright issues in that order? |
Jenny Niven |
Sounds good Brian |
Ralph Weedon |
Yes |
Elaine Bloss |
Yep |
Emma Templeton |
Yes please |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes... |
Iain Middleton |
Yes |
Roy Pearce |
Ok |
Brian Kelly |
---- (1) Firewalls (and other SysAdmin and security stuff) ---- Time: 13:12 |
Brian Kelly |
It's good that Roy Pearce is here, as he is a SysAdmin |
Brian Kelly |
Is your IT Service a barrier? Does it stop you from deploying your projects and services due to security reasons? I guess there is a feeling that this is true |
John Holman |
Ok .. I’m from the IT service side, and I think there is that perception. It can be hard to get the balance right |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes, but staff changes have meant a definite improvement lately |
Ralph Weedon |
Not so here so far |
Iain Middleton |
Yes - "security issues" are cited regularly. |
Ralph Weedon |
IF anything I am concerned there are not the resources to do enough on the security side |
Evelyn Toseland |
Also that senior mgmt doesn't really understand the security issues. |
John Holman |
and they are very real .. The problem is to decide on the balance of costs and benefits |
Roy Pearce |
Ralph, Evelyn - absolutely. we struggle to maintain high levels of security. |
Brian Kelly |
I used to work in IT
Services - and was aware that this was a problem as far as users departments
were concerned. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes, Roy, but also they sometimes think things are worse than they are. |
Emma Templeton |
Isn't this then a communication problem Evelyn |
Roy Pearce |
Evelyn, I think not (here at Bham) they assume we can do it all, |
Brian Kelly |
I would agree with Emma - SysAdmins need spin doctors :-) |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes, Emma, and isn't it often a matter of educating our users? teach them not to open email attachments, etc. |
Elaine Bloss |
I agree with Emma. An understanding of the issues would help |
Iain Middleton |
Most communication round here is by email attachments, including from the IT dept! |
Brian Kelly |
I think there is a need to educate users of the scale of the problems - e.g. the services which have been badly hacked. |
Ralph Weedon |
I agree education is needed, but this needs resources and the backing of senior managment/HOd's etc |
Evelyn Toseland |
Amen. |
Elaine Bloss |
but do senior management/hod's understand all the issues? |
Brian Kelly |
I encountered similar issues back in the days of TLTP projects (early 1990s). CBL developers had sexy PCs to develop solutions (e.g. using Toobox). The deliverables couldn't be implemented on the campus network due to security, permissions, file space, etc. problems. |
Evelyn Toseland |
That's what I mean - we have to educate them first. |
Ralph Weedon |
Possibly not, is it even on their radar? |
Iain Middleton |
Education for the users - what kind? Does it make a difference to them *why* they can't do/have such-and-such? |
John Holman |
I think security is about calculating risks and balancing benefits. understanding the risks can need a lot of technical expertise. |
Roy Pearce |
Admitting any system needs close attention to ovoid breaches is tantamount to saying it is inadequate. |
Emma Templeton |
I think the normal user sees system admin and security as things beyond there understanding but a little explanation can go a long way. |
John Holman |
Understanding the benefits requires other skills - not usually in the same person |
Brian Kelly |
We addressed this by working closely with departmental developers, getting them involved in writing guidelines on what could and couldn't be done/ |
Jenny Niven |
I think that could be the key - getting developers involved in writing the guidelines |
Jenny Niven |
Gives them more of a sense of ownership too |
Ralph Weedon |
Nods in agreement |
Emma Templeton |
Iain I think its important so that they don’t feel patronised by someone simply saying no you cant do that, if you just say that they’ll always say why not? |
Brian Kelly |
I gave a talk on getting project deliverables deployed in a service environment recently. See my slides at <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/jisc-jun-2001/>. |
Brian Kelly |
If anybody would be willing to help, I'd be prepared to try and produce some guidelines based on my slides and input from others. I'd like to do this in any case for JISC-funded projects. |
Iain Middleton |
Emma - no argument over the need to give an explanation to users if something's not possible |
Evelyn Toseland |
That would be really helpful, Brian. |
Ralph Weedon |
Not my area of expertise .... but willing to try and help |
Brian Kelly |
Roy, would you be willing to give me the SysAdminy perspective? Elaine, can we talk about it (as you're on the same corridor as me)? |
Evelyn Toseland |
I could help re accessibility? |
Elaine Bloss |
Yes, sure |
Roy Pearce |
Brian, yes, of course. |
Brian Kelly |
Anyone like to be involved? If so email me later (B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk)? This is also true for people reading the transcript! |
Brian Kelly |
Let's move on. |
Brian Kelly |
---------------- (2) Techie Cultural Issues (Unix vs Windows) ---------------- |
Jenny Niven |
Hello Patricia |
Jenny Niven |
Hello Andy |
Andy Rock |
Hi |
Patricia Spence |
Hi jenny |
Andy Rock |
[waves to Mandy] |
Evelyn Toseland |
I get the feeling that there's a Unix good, Windows bad attitude. |
Evelyn Toseland |
At least among techie people... |
Roy Pearce |
I’m guilty of this one! Can it be rationalised? |
Evelyn Toseland |
And recruiters! |
Andy Rock |
I’m guilty too. |
Brian Kelly |
The Techie Cultural Issues (Unix vs Windows), etc. is probably related to the previous discussion - Unix people in IT Services being over concerned over security vs departmental developers on PCs want to do things quickly . |
Iain Middleton |
...but among management here it's the opposite. |
Andy Rock |
Unix is by far way more stable. |
Ralph Weedon |
The Microsoft Anti-Trust case and the outpouring of negative articles on Windows, including Security |
Evelyn Toseland |
Is Unix more powerful? |
John Holman |
One issue is that proprietary solutions often are linked with windows, open ones with Unix |
Ralph Weedon |
Does not help, even if some of it is unfair, |
Andy Rock |
yes, Unix is far 'leaner' |
Brian Kelly |
However there are also religious views (Linux and Open Source) and a dislike of Bill G and Microsoft. |
Elaine Bloss |
sure but Microsoft is prevalent amongst users so we have to cater for it |
Roy Pearce |
I find that few ms devotees have any experience of anything else. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Isn't it that users come in using Windows and unless they are interested in techie stuff |
Evelyn Toseland |
That’s where they stay? |
Brian Kelly |
Last week I argued that we should be agnostic, and support open standards so that systems would interoperate across platforms. |
Roy Pearce |
Evelyn, yes, is it the schools.colleges that are ms-dependent? |
John Holman |
yes .. but users shouldn't need to be concerned with the platform for web services |
Mandy Bentham |
hi - |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes Brian! |
Andy Rock |
Funny enough, Micro$oft just released a white paper on how/why windows is in fact more stable/secure, etc than Unix |
Roy Pearce |
John, but they are. webct here is such an example. |
John Holman |
Brian, I’d agree .. but often pressure for proprietary solutions implies pressure for windows |
Brian Kelly |
However even if we are agnostic, we still have to chose a platform - and that’s when problems can happen. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Roy, I think it is that that's what ppl learn first. Then they have too many other things to do so they stick there. |
Roy Pearce |
Andy, have u a URL? |
Andy Rock |
For? |
John Holman |
My choice would be Unix for central provision, where there is a choice |
Andy Rock |
Oh, sorry, no. saw it in the front of Linux mag |
Roy Pearce |
The ms white paper you mentioned re ms v Unix |
Andy Rock |
Can’t be too hard to find it, though (unless you look on MS website!) |
Evelyn Toseland |
I like open source - son works on it - and Linux. politically. But not allowed at work;( |
Brian Kelly |
We've obviously a lot of interest in this topic, judging by all the messages! |
John Holman |
Generally open source will work on either windows or Unix .. |
Evelyn Toseland |
What do you expect on a religious topic, Brian? |
Roy Pearce |
Evelyn, not allowed? I've just put Solaris on my PC and thrown out windoze |
Andy Rock |
MS are running a propaganda campaign against Linux right now, which to me, speaks volumes about their fears and predictions |
Brian Kelly |
I'm not sure if we will reach an agreement on anything. One suggestion I have made in the past is to have a debated on Open Vs Licensed approaches at a conference, or a head-to-head debate in an article. |
Andy Rock |
and I’ve NEVER seen UNIX crash yet. |
John Holman |
Evelyn - its not just religion. if you choose Unix some things are not possible - typically Microsoft solutions - that you might otherwise want to use |
Ralph Weedon |
This is probably daft, but practically (if not economically) could an entire institution leave Windows for an alternative |
Evelyn Toseland |
I know, John. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes, Ralph, I think they could. Some 3rd world places work on Linux. |
Brian Kelly |
Sorry Andy I've see Unix systems crash - and my WAP phone , and a Psion and .... Computers do crash. |
Roy Pearce |
Ralph, is anyone researching the possibility of a windows-free institution? |
Andy Rock |
I agree with John, it's because MS's proprietary solutions are so commonplace that we can't consider UNIX for end users just yet |
John Holman |
Ralph - I think it would be hard. But I think apart from desktop systems there is no need for windows |
Elaine Bloss |
I think Ralph’s got a point. Financially Microsoft have made their products extremely attractive to institutions |
Evelyn Toseland |
Look at China. |
Brian Kelly |
Hi Roy, don't know about that but there are large Univs which are getting rid of Unix boxes! |
Ralph Weedon |
Thanks Evelyn, so is it cost that stops UK people or ignorance, or cannot be bothered ... |
Brian Kelly |
For example Leeds Univ (where I used to work) and Leicester - an early adopter of Windows 2000. |
Evelyn Toseland |
I think it's lack of knowledge on the part of the bosses, not the programmers. |
John Holman |
Brian - I wonder what the basis of such decisions really is |
Evelyn Toseland |
They don't know anything about eg Linux except that hackers use it, but they have all heard of Windows |
Roy Pearce |
perhaps univs can no longer afford good Unix people. (I'm too old to move now so I stay!) |
Ralph Weedon |
Not sure any research on Windows free places --- Brian, would you fancy doing an article?!!! |
Elaine Bloss |
but is also a perception - on the users part- of usability when comparing Unix and windows |
Brian Kelly |
Roy's issue about technical expertise is a good one - we'll discuss that later |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes Elaine. |
Brian Kelly |
Shall we move on? |
Roy Pearce |
Yes |
Elaine Bloss |
Ok |
Ralph Weedon |
Ok |
John Holman |
Ok |
Iain Middleton |
Yes |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yup |
Mandy Bentham |
Yes |
Andy Rock |
Let’s. no-one's going to fully agree on the MS v UNIX one |
Brian Kelly |
------------------ (3) Browser issues ------------------------- 13:34 |
Andy Rock |
ah, another emotive topic |
Andy Rock |
Lol |
Roy Pearce |
Is there a future for mozilla/netscape/opera? |
Brian Kelly |
Possibly another MS vs the opposition, but also some other issues. |
Andy Rock |
I think so, Roy. |
Ralph Weedon |
Despite efforts I still cannot get my PC to have Netscape as a default ... is this just my technical ignorance |
Brian Kelly |
Let's do the non-contentious stuff first |
Brian Kelly |
What do we do about old browsers? |
John Holman |
That’s non-contentious!? |
Evelyn Toseland |
We have to accept them. |
Roy Pearce |
How old is old? |
Andy Rock |
We have to cater for them but draw the line somewhere |
Brian Kelly |
Having to provide support for flaky old browsers, which have bugs and don't support modern stuff (JavaScript, certificates, CSS, etc.) is a problem. |
Andy Rock |
I don't do anything for less than level 4 |
Evelyn Toseland |
Not if you make your pages accessible? |
Evelyn Toseland |
Not that mine are... |
Ralph Weedon |
There may be legal issues --- SEN and Disability law, accessibility generally |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes Ralph. |
Brian Kelly |
There are solutions to the accessibility issues. |
Andy Rock |
the real trick, I think, is keeping things simple-ish |
Iain Middleton |
It's a question of assessing their importance to ongoing business |
Elaine Bloss |
I think a line has to be drawn in the sand somewhere. |
Andy Rock |
yes, definitely, Elaine |
Roy Pearce |
Who monitors browser agent signatures to get a feel for %age of old browsers in use. |
John Holman |
Yes Elaine .. eg SSL is needed, basic javascript is needed |
Evelyn Toseland |
If you want to get your message to everyone don't you have to write for all browsers? |
Brian Kelly |
D'oh pressed the wrong button and lost my chat session! |
Evelyn Toseland |
Know that feeling. |
Elaine Bloss |
sure, after how many software companies still write applications that can be run on 286's? |
Andy Rock |
the cost issue is a reason why I feel that open source dev will eventually gain momentum |
Brian Kelly |
Maximising support for devices means XML, XSLT, ... not writing HTML which NS 3 can understand |
Roy Pearce |
ns 03 about 6%; msie <4 about 1%; hotjava 0%! |
Evelyn Toseland |
That's all right, Brian, if your institution supports those things. |
Andy Rock |
if you can run UINX and Mozilla for free, and your costs need to be low, why would you pay MS for their stuff?> |
John Holman |
Brian - why would you need to deliver xml etc to the browser? isn't the point of xslt etc to allow different versions for different devices? |
Brian Kelly |
I agree with Elaine that you have to make a decision. I am in discussions with JISC about the processes for defining the level |
Roy Pearce |
Andy, do you mean mozilla or netscape? |
Andy Rock |
depends on which netscape we're on about, lol. |
Brian Kelly |
hi John, yes but you'll be sending XHTML & CSS which some old browsers won't support properly. |
Andy Rock |
6 is practically Mozilla anyway, isn't it? |
John Holman |
Brian - why not send html adapted to the browser? |
Evelyn Toseland |
John - using server solutions? |
Roy Pearce |
Andy, not sure but mozilla holds up better than ns6 on my pc |
Brian Kelly |
Keeping things simple, focussing on old browsers will, quite simply, mean that you can't develop the type of solutions which many users expect these days! |
Andy Rock |
I think they're based around the same engine. |
Andy Rock |
I can hardly talk; I still use IE |
Andy Rock |
Lol |
John Holman |
ah, ok, maybe one criterion for acceptable browser is that it can cope with XHTML, for Brian's reason |
Elaine Bloss |
and it's the users expectations that are driving the development of the browsers forward |
Evelyn Toseland |
Some users. |
Roy Pearce |
how about standards conformity? where's the gospel on this for non-old browsers? |
Brian Kelly |
Note to Evelyn - in a JANET environment, it would be possible to provide solutions on the network, so they aren't needed locally (cf Athens which is a centralised authentication service) |
Evelyn Toseland |
As long as ppl are accessing over Janet, Brian? |
Brian Kelly |
The W3C gospel is that old browsers are broken and that we should be providing the standards stuff - XML, XHTML, CSS, XSLT |
Andy Rock |
personally, I believe Netscape sticks to the standards rigidly. which is sometimes the problem. |
Brian Kelly |
WHAT- Andy? Netscape have broken every standard in sight :-( |
John Holman |
Brian - in the past such gospels have failed (think OSI networking, X400 etc) in the face of missing products |
Andy Rock |
which version are we talking about? |
Andy Rock |
sorry, I tend to mean version 6 when I talk about Netscape. |
Brian Kelly |
Hi John, yes but I'm talking about standards in which there are interoperable solutions available. |
Roy Pearce |
Brian, reference for ns misdemeanours? |
John Holman |
Ok - in the face of popular products (e.g. old browsers) that don't support the desired standards (e.g. IP) |
Brian Kelly |
Have we reached another point where there are distinct views? Shall we move on? (Will reply to Roy) |
Elaine Bloss |
as time is pressing, yes please |
Ralph Weedon |
OK |
Evelyn Toseland |
yes. |
Brian Kelly |
Roy, I was referring to Netscape's view of standards in the past. I don't know what AOL Netscape will do in the future. I've read that they are moving out of the browser market. |
Brian Kelly |
--------------- (4) Lack of IT support -------------------- |
Evelyn Toseland |
mmmmm |
Roy Pearce |
Brian, mmm, can't see that aol will stick with browser product. |
Brian Kelly |
We want to do innovative stuff, or wide ranging stuff, or stick will the current stuff, but we haven't got the IT support. What do we do? |
Evelyn Toseland |
Learn to do it ourselves? |
Brian Kelly |
I'm assuming that we are all busy enough as is! |
Emma Templeton |
There is a lot of that going on just now Evelyn |
Iain Middleton |
If we do it badly enough, someone'll notice and pity us... |
Elaine Bloss |
That's been CDNTL's general way of sorting it out |
Evelyn Toseland |
I hope so, Iain, but it hasn't happened yet;) |
Brian Kelly |
Are there extra resources we can be making use of? |
Ralph Weedon |
Staff Development??? |
Evelyn Toseland |
There's lots online but you need hours to find things. A directory would help |
Jenny Niven |
Probably, it's finding the time to locate those resources though |
Brian Kelly |
How about student effort? How about providing projects for use by the many MSCs in Internet technologies that are now available? |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes Ralph! |
John Holman |
Student supervision requires support also |
Ralph Weedon |
Good Idea, needs someone to take this forward though |
Elaine Bloss |
Student effort is good but what about when the students leaves |
Ralph Weedon |
Agreed, student projects can require support and resources |
Brian Kelly |
I was thinking about student projects exploring the issues, rather than delivering solutions. |
Brian Kelly |
So, can you develop a solution using XML and XSLT which can be accessed by a range of current browsers? Let a student project fid the answer |
Ralph Weedon |
OK, but who then delivers the solutions? |
Brian Kelly |
If the project provides the approach is feasible, then we develop it / buy it for ourselves. |
Ralph Weedon |
UMM .... |
Elaine Bloss |
Which then comes back to an issues of resources |
John Holman |
I think the costs are mostly in development and long term support - not initial investigation |
Brian Kelly |
Another issue is development for ourselves. Is there any scope in job exchange, for example? |
Andy Rock |
I agree |
Ralph Weedon |
Can you say more on this Brian? |
Evelyn Toseland |
Brian, anything about staff development would be good. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Job exchange as in secondments? |
Brian Kelly |
There are various professional bodies for Web developers, e.g. WoW (no URL to hand) |
Andy Rock |
I think that the power of self teaching is very underrated, especially by ourselves |
Brian Kelly |
Secondments is one possibility |
Andy Rock |
by ourselves, I mean our own perceptions of what we can do |
Elaine Bloss |
But knowledge sharing even within institutions could be encouraged |
Evelyn Toseland |
Can I ask, how many here are self-taught? |
Brian Kelly |
I suspect there may be advantages in closer liaison with Computer Science departments. |
Andy Rock |
[puts hand up] |
Evelyn Toseland |
I am. |
Brian Kelly |
Me too |
John Holman |
Brian - certainly true for us |
Emma Templeton |
yeap |
Elaine Bloss |
Me |
Roy Pearce |
Brian, wow is at www.joinwow.org |
John Holman |
yep |
Ralph Weedon |
Partly |
Iain Middleton |
aye |
Andy Rock |
I learn virtually everything I need to know from the web or researching what I need to know |
Brian Kelly |
What magazines, books, courses, etc would you recommend? |
Roy Pearce |
is there much contact between compsci and comp centres? we were once a single dept. now como centre is part of the library. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Lynda Weinman! |
Brian Kelly |
I get Web techniques, Internet Works, Internet Magazine, all of which are useful. |
Jenny Niven |
Andy - I'd add colleagues to that list |
John Holman |
Roy - we have informal contact and good agreement on technical strategy as a result |
Evelyn Toseland |
She did (does)some brilliant stuff on graphics for web. |
Andy Rock |
Yes, definitely. I learn so much just from the people in the room I work in. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Internet Works is good. |
Brian Kelly |
I've heard the Netskills courses are good (nb. I used to work for them). |
Andy Rock |
We bounce each other's ideas around and get five opinions |
Roy Pearce |
mags - see webdeveloper.com |
Andy Rock |
Lol, Brian. |
Evelyn Toseland |
And Web-support, Brian - that's been my most helpful resource (smarm) |
Andy Rock |
I trawl newsgroups. |
Andy Rock |
so much in there. You just have to learn to filter the spam as you read |
Brian Kelly |
As well as mailing lists and newsgroup, should we use other fora? |
Elaine Bloss |
Newsgroups have been a good source of info for me |
Evelyn Toseland |
Email groups in general. Webd. |
Roy Pearce |
oops, mag is web techniques |
Ralph Weedon |
Yes, have done netskills courses, they are good but not many alternatives? |
John Holman |
I learn a lot (in technical areas) from mailing lists for open source developments etc |
Evelyn Toseland |
Not too struck on netskills. |
Jenny Niven |
The bells outside are telling me it's 2pm. Are there any more burning issues to discuss? We can always continue in the discussion room if people need to leave |
Brian Kelly |
For example, how about a regular online chat, with a variety of experts facilitating discussions? |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes please! |
Andy Rock |
Sounds good |
Elaine Bloss |
Yes that would be very helpful |
Jenny Niven |
Brian - that sounds great |
Brian Kelly |
I can stay for 10 mins or so. |
Roy Pearce |
see www.webtechniques.com |
Iain Middleton |
Oh yes... |
Ralph Weedon |
OK, thanks |
Jenny Niven |
Would people like to continue with experts in the VLS? |
Evelyn Toseland |
Yes please. |
Roy Pearce |
Jenny, yes please. |
Andy Rock |
Ok |
Emma Templeton |
Yes |
Elaine Bloss |
Yes |
Ralph Weedon |
Yes |
Evelyn Toseland |
I have to go cook a duck! Thank you very much, Brian et al. |
Brian Kelly |
Jenny, have you got a way of contacting everyone? I advertised on a couple of JISCmail lists. |
Brian Kelly |
One final comment. |
Andy Rock |
I’ve just been informed that I’m late for a team meeting! sorry, everyone, I have to go. speak to you soon:-) |
Brian Kelly |
Next year's Institutional Web Management Workshop will be at Strathclyde in June. I'd like to use that as a forum for addressing issues raised today. |
Jenny Niven |
sorry, lost connection briefly |
Evelyn Toseland |
Hope to get there. |
Roy Pearce |
I’ve enjoyed this. Blush, blush -first time I've visited a chat room for ages. bye everyone. |
Evelyn Toseland |
Bye and thanks. |
Brain Kelly |
In Belfast in June, we agreed to use technology such as this to discuss issues which should be covered. I'd like to continue a debate on this topic using an online chat somewhere. |
Jenny Niven |
Brian - thanks for hosting another great discussion |
Elaine Bloss |
yes, thanks Brian |
Jenny Niven |
I hope to see you all in the discussion room for continued debate |
Jenny Niven |
Brian - yes we can contact everyone |
John Holman |
Jenny - how to get there? |
Jenny Niven |
Click on community, then discussion rooms |
Emma Templeton |
Yes thanks Brian and jenny at the VLS for
hosting this interesting session |
Jenny Niven |
The room you're after is Web Development & Design |
John Holman |
Thanks all .. bye |
Jenny Niven |
Bye for now |
Ralph Weedon |
Many thanks Brian and Jenny |
Iain Middleton |
Thanks Brian, thanks Jenny, and everyone else. Bye! |
LEGAL
DISCLAIMER: Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the information in this
communication is accurate we cannot accept responsibility for any action, legal
or otherwise, based on this material.