Facing the Legal Challenges of Providing
Internet Access in HEIs

Analysis Of Evaluation Forms

The ateendess were asked to fill in an evaluation form.

100% of attendees said the seminar met their expectations.

Session 1 - Intellectual Property

87% of attendees rated as being very useful.
13% of attendees rated as being quite useful.

Session 2 - Criminal Liability

71% of attendees rated as being very useful.
24% of attendees rated as being quite useful.
5% of attendees rated as being not very useful.

Session 3 - Data Protection/Defamation

57% of attendees rated as being very useful.
40% of attendees rated as being quite useful.
2% of attendees rated as being not very useful.

Session 4 - Educating the User, Training the Administrator

62% of attendees rated as being very useful.
32% of attendees rated as being quite useful.
2% of attendees rated as being not very useful.

Panel Discussion

22% of attendees rated as being very useful.
22% of attendees rated as being quite useful.
3% of attendees rated as being not very useful.

Workshop materials

48% of attendees rated as being very good.
49% of attendees rated as being good.
2% of attendees rated as being not very good.

Did the Seminar address the issues sufficiently

62% of attendees thought yes.

Comments included:

"It was all very good"

"Issues were clearly outlined"

"... covered the issues very comprehensively. Many more issues raised than I expected"

" it was good for the basics"

"I enjoyed the seminar immensely.. "

" the material was well directed and pitched at the right level"

" the seminar addressed the major issues sufficiently"

" ... the level of presentation and discussion was as high as I had hoped ... "

"Excellent seminar .. perhaps a case for more updates"

Was the Seminar a successful model for future events

81% thought yes.

Comments included:

"... more interaction would have been useful "

"Definitely"

" not as much feedback as there might have been"

"Very Good"

"Could have been slightly shorter"

"...regular updates would be useful"

"Yes, do it again"

"Needed more workshop style activities"

"Enough material for more than 1 day"

"If it were run again I would recommend that colleagues attend"

"Several others from my institution would have like to have come"

Suggestions for improvements for future workshops

5 attendees suggested allocating more time for breaks.

11 attendees suggested allocating more time to discussion/question and answer sessions by shortening the presentation times.

Other suggestions included:

"Could draw up action points/recommendations at end and get agreement on priorities"

"Chairs were very uncomfortable - ideally there should be something to rest on"

"Perhaps have more speakers with wider range of opinions and experience"

"Follow up might cover more detailed implementation"

"More interaction and shorter day"

"More practical input - hypotheticals and case studies"

"More practical sessions on implementation"

How convenient was the location

79% of attendees rated it as being convenient with comments ranging from "ok" and "fair" to "very good" and "excellent".

13% of attendees rated it as being inconvenient.

Venue

60% of attendees rated Burleigh Court as very good.
37% of attendees rated it as good.
2% of attendees rated it as fair.

Food

51% of attendees rated the food as very good.
37% of attendees rated it as good.
8% of attendees rated it as fair.

Administration

60% of attendees rated the administration as very good.
35% of attendees rated it as good.
2% of attendees rated it as fair.

Introduction